------------------------------
N. (THE HERETOFORE ABOVE-LISTED RECIPIENTS)
Petitioner,
-against-
M. GALLOPAVO, ESQ.
Respondent.
- ------------------------------
Upon the annexed affirmation of M. gallopavo,
Esq., subscribed October 24, 2007, the annexed exhibits and upon all the papers
and proceedings had heretofore herein, LET the petitioner, N.,
show cause before me or one of the judges of the Turkey Court of the City of
San Mateo, County of San Mateo, at a Motion Part thereof, Part E, located at
2347 Clipper Street, San Mateo, California 94403, on the 22nd day of November,
2007, at 10:30 a.m. or as soon thereafter as counsel can be heard, WHY an
order should not be issued, which:
SUFFICIENT CAUSE
THEREFORE APPEARING, let service a copy of this order by Samuel Thompson
upon the petitioner, N., DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOL AND PRESERVATION, and M.
GALLOPAVO, ESQ., on or before the 24th day of October, 2007 be deemed good
and sufficient service.
PENDING A HEARING AND
DETERMINATION OF THIS MOTION, the petitioner, N., its agents,
assigns or employees or attorneys are hereby stayed from pursuing any action
herein.
DATED:
October 24, 2007
/s/
J.T.C.
------------------------------
------------------------------
N. (THE HERETOFORE ABOVE-LISTED RECIPIENTS)
DINNER
M. GALLOPAVO, ESQ.
Respondent.
-------------------------------
M. gallopavo, Esq., an atturkey duly
admitted to practice law before the Courts of the State of
WHEREFORE, I pray for the relief requested.
/s/
M.
gallopavo, Esq.
Sworn to me before this
day of
, 2007
/s/
Notary Public